Brands in Bollywood movies

The globalization of media allows brand placements subtle ways to reach local and
international consumers. We often discuss product placement in american movies but sometimes forget about other countries. The main “competitor” of Hollywood is obviously Bollywood.

How does product placement work in Bollywood?

After my trip to India (which explains why I did not post for a while), I realized that product placement is a communication tool often used in Bollywood movies.

  • Product Placement in Bollywood

A growing example of brand placements in non-US media is the Hindi film industry in India. Increasingly, Bollywood producers are accepting cash from multinational advertisers. Yet, little is known about how Indian consumers respond to such initiatives.

Bollywood offers an enormous production output (approximately 1000 films/year), compared with Hollywood (473 in 2003, Motional Picture Association of America, Inc.). Bollywood benefits from a large audience eager for consumption. Indian consumers are considered to be sophisticated and savvy, even transcending language or class boundaries.

In India, films are relatively inexpensive to produce. However, they are largely self-financed. Before, Indian brands were shown in background, usually within the songs. In the past ten years, multinational brands have looked to local media to reach Indian market.  They are nowadays, in the daily lives of Indians.

For example, Coca-Cola plays an increasingly prominent role in scripts. In Taal (1991, ‘Rhythm’) the lead couple romance over a bottle of Coke and in Mohabbatein (2001, ‘Loves’), verbal mentions of Coca-Cola become prominent.

  • Cultural impact

Cultural values and communication styles influence advertising persuasion and can influence the way consumers process product placements. India is seen as a collectivist culture, individuals are primarily motivated by the norms of those collectives. However, they are also considered vertical coUectivists, given to their desire to stand out from others and the caste system. If we look at the Hofstede’s cultural dimensions model (2001), India scores high in the cultural dimension power distance and verticality (individualist vs collectivist), showing that status in the hierarchy are important.  Looking up to successful people in the hierarchy    (such as celebrities) is also really important in this country. Even temples are constructed for some of them. Thus, brands placed  in the hands of characters admired by the audience may be really effective. The important adherence to in-group norms can also influence the brand selection. The Indian audience is emotionally involved with onscreen actors, and always looked to the actors and actresses for new trends, fashions, and hairstyles. Another important factor is that, even if Indians are devoted to religion, materialism is seen as belonging to the same realm of experience.

  • Communication

Indian communication is characterized as group-explicit non-verbal style and symbols are important in advertising. The message is explicite but through non-verbal communications. Individuals in high-context cultures look to visual symbols to communicate. Indians may be more apt to note brand symbolism in films. Moreover, it can be more enhanced for those who are conscious of brands.

The length of Bollywood movies (they typically last 3 hours) offers additional opportunities for brand placements.

The trend of weaving a product into the storyline has become common in the Hindi film industry in the past few years. Recent films, such as Fashion (2008; featuring Sunshine and Kimaya) and Dostana (2008; featuring the magazine Verve) included several brands that were integral to the movies’ themes.

As product placement is really important, most Bollywood movie producers have separate departments to handle it in their movies.

Even if some researchers have studied explicit measures of product placement effectiveness (memory), implicit measures should be explored (such as brand evaluation and choice).

Posted in Product Placement strategies | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Would you like a beer, Mr Bond?

In any James Bond movies, the MI6 agent has always been drinking martinis, driving luxurious cars, wearing the fanciest suits and the most expensive watches. That’s how we know him! But things sometimes change… and not always for the best!

In the upcoming James Bond movie, the famous agent will be drinking a bottle of Heineken… 007 ditching vodka martinis for beer?!

James Bond movies are famous for being the ones with the biggest amount of product placements. They include mostly upmarket range products. The introduction of Heineken in the next James Bond movie is considered by many people (especially J.Bond fans) as irrelevant. It can change the famous “upper-class” image of the secret agent. As beer in movies has rarely been used before to suggest sophistication; the challenge, here, is to show J. Bond quaffing his beer without allowing it to compromise his mystique.

However, it has been confirmed that Skyfall will have a Heineken product placement. Even if the brewery has always been a partner of the franchise, no one was expecting an appearance of a bottle in a film. This represents its strongest attempt to integrate the brand with the Bond saga. Along with the product integration, Heineken will launch a sophisticated international ad campaign featuring Daniel Craig.

If it is a good news for Heineken, some fans might not receive this placement so well. It had already happened when J. Bond switched to Aston Martin from BMW. However, lead actor, Daniel Craig, stands by the new drink for his character. He stated that even if he was regretful about this change, he understood its necessity. Product placements, as well as branded-placements, are necessary for blockbusters. A big part of the budget for a James Bond movie is provided by companies.

Nowadays, companies play an important role in films production. This beer placement is just another proof. However, even if the audience generally accepts product placements and understands its necessity, some people might feel frustrated about this one. If the plot (and here the change of the main character habits) starts to be conditioned by companies, we could question the role of film production companies. In France, Orange – France Telecom has already launched its own film production subsidiary, Studio 37. We could wonder if one day, big companies will rule the entire world of cinema.

Posted in What's new? | Tagged , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Warner Bros. suied by Louis Vuitton over “Hangover 2″

“The Hangover: Part II” continues to be plagued by legal problems. Most recently, Louis Vuitton filed a trademark infringement suit against the movie for what the designer brand describes as a offending product placement.

A character in the film uses a fake Louis Vuitton bag. In the scene, Alan (played by Zach Galifianakis) warns another character to stay away from his fake bag: “Careful, that is.. that is a Louis Vuitton” (pronouncing Louis with the “s”) . For comedic purposes, Alan mispronounces the brand name.

The scene was not received well by the designer bag maker Louis Vuitton, filing a complaint against Warner Bros. for trademark dilution, false designation of origin, and unfair competition. Warner Bros. used fakes created by Diophy, a company that produces faux luxury bags, and that Vuitton is already suing.

Warner Bros. may not have understood the problems of counterfeit production.  Dana Thomas, author of “Deluxe: How Luxury Lost its Luster” states that counterfeiting rakes in approximately $600 billion a year and the secretive and corrupt industry supports human trafficking, prostitution, child labor, gang warfare, drug smuggling and money laundering linked to global terrorism.

In addition to the filed cases, Louis Vuitton demanded that the scene be altered for the comedy movie’s DVD release. Unfortunately, it fell on deaf ears.

Prior to this, the film also had legal problems for using a tattoo that resembled the one designed by Mike Tyson’s tattoo expert. The case was eventually settled.

If Warner Bros. ends up losing the case filed by Louis Vuitton, it could greatly hurt the studio. The luxury brand wants the studio to surrender all copies of the film in addition to damages.

Posted in What's new? | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

The Hire, 8 short films for BMW

If you want more placements of your cars, why don’t you produce your own short films?

One of the greatest communication campaigns is definitively BMW’s The Hire online marketing campaign.

BMW launched 8 short movies directed by the best directors. This serie of 8 “episodes” called, The Hire, starring Clive Owen as the lead character and the link between the different parts received tangible results and heaps of awards.

bmwfilms.com launches with a series of short films available for viewing. Clive Owen plays the driver, a man who goes from place to place, getting hired by various people to be a sort of transport for their vital needs.

The serie starts in 2001 with the launch of “Ambush”, directed by John Frankenheimer (Reindeer Games), featuring the BMW 7 series.

Along with “Ambush”, four other short films were released in 2001, including:

“Chosen” directed by Ang Lee (Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon) featuring the BMW 5 series.

The Follow” directed by Wong Kar-Wai  (In the Mood for Love) with Forest Whitaker, Mickey Rourke, and Adriana Lima and featuring the BMW 3 series and Z3 roadster.

Powder Keg” directed by Alejandro González Iñárritu (21 grams, Babel) featuring the BMW X5 .

Star” directed by Guy Ritchie (Snatch; Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels; Sherlock Holmes) with Madonna and featuring the BMW M5.

As the first series are a success, BMW release a second serie of three more short films in 2002.

The second series starts with “Ticker”, directed by Joe Carnahan (Smokin’Aces, The A Team), with Don Cheadle and Ray Liotta, and featuring the BMW Z4 Roadster.

Followed by “Hostage”, directed by John Woo (Face/Off, MI:2) and “Beat the Devil”, directed by Tony Scott with James Brown, Gary Oldman, Danny Trejo and Marilyn Manson.

This campaign arose from BMW’s growing concern that past campaigns had been missing the company’s target audience:  well-to-do, high-achieving males who usually researched purchases using the Internet and lacked the time to watch network television. Research showed that consumers inclined to purchase BMWs were also broadband-connected, tech-savvy males and that 85 percent of this population studied BMW’s cars online before even stepping into a showroom. To study the effectiveness of ‘‘The Hire,’’ BMW and Fallon devised units of measurement called ‘‘BMW minutes,’’ which calculated how much time viewers spent with the new Internet campaign compared to previous television campaigns. ‘‘We were astonished to discover that a major fraction of the total BMW minutes were Internet minutes,’’ McDowell told Advertising Age. Males made up 68 percent of the viewers, 42 percent of whom came from households with incomes greater than $75,000. The second suite of ‘‘The Hire’’ films featured BMW’s new Z4 roadster, which aimed at a demographic that could hopefully afford them. In late 2002 BMW began running its eight films on an exclusive BMW channel for DirecTV. The channel, which was available for a limited time, interspersed the films with behind-the-scenes footage and special ‘‘subplot’’ spots.

Results:

In 2001, BMW’s sales increased by 12,5% compared to 2000.

In 2002, BMW’s sales increased by 17.2% compared to 2001. It helped the brand to outsell Mercedes and placed it second only to Lexus in the luxury-car market.

During the first months of the campaign, the films were viewed more than 11 million times.

By June 2003 the films had been viewed more than 45 million times.

Awards:

- Awarded the Cyber Lion Grand Prix at Cannes in 2002 (Cannes is the ‘Academy Awards’ of advertising)
- Awarded “Best Excuse for Broadband” at WIRED Magazine’s third annual Rave Awards in 2001
- Recipient of two Grand Clio Awards and Best of Show at the One Show Interactive competition
- In 2002, the Los Angeles International Short Film Festival’s “Best Action Short” award was given to director John Woo for Hostage
- Won the first-ever Titanium Lion, the highest honor at the Cannes International Advertising Festival. The award recognizes campaigns that caused ‘‘the industry to stop in its tracks and reconsider the way forward.’’
- In 2003, The Hire series was inducted into the permanent collection of the Museum of Modern Art (MOMA)

Ambush Directed by John Frankenheimer Starring: Clive Owen, Tomas Milian, / Written by Andrew Kevin Walker /

Star Directed by Guy Ritchie / Starring: Clive Owen, Madonna

Beat the Devil Directed by Tony Scott, / Based on an original concept created by David Fincher and Fallon Worldwide / Producers: Tony Scott, Ridley Scott, Jules Daly /Starring: Clive Owen, James Brown, Gary Oldman, Marilyn Manson, Danny Trejo

Ticker  Directed by Joe Carnahan / Starring: Clive Owen, Don Cheadle

Posted in Examples of product placement, Web Serie | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

New agreement between US and China: better product placement exposure

New agreement between US and China: better product placement exposure

After the visit of Xi Jinping (vice president of the People’s Republic of China) to the United States, a new agreement has been established concerning product placement.  With this groundbreaking deal, the United States will be relaxing controls on China’s movie market.

According to Vice President Joe Biden, the new deal will grant US studios and independent filmmakers easier access to the ever-growing Chinese audience.

He states that “This agreement with China will make it easier than ever before for U.S. studios and independent filmmakers to reach the fast-growing Chinese audience, supporting thousands of American jobs in and around the film industry.”

The agreement includes a deal with Dreamworks Animation studio for a filmmaking joint venture in Shanghai. It is good news for one of the few industries where America still excels at, while easing access to China’s billion strong audience for the product placement industry. The deal opens China to an additional 14 U.S. produced films on top of the 20 non-Chinese movies for the market. The stipulations of this agreement include: all films must be produced in 3D or IMAX formats and an increased stake for the US government through distribution. The formats required calls into question how much the new agreement will help “independent filmmakers”. China now has just over 2,500 screens capable of handling 3D films and will soon have around 50 IMAX-capable screens.

A good example is the last summer’s blockbuster “Transformers: Dark of the Moon” (2012 Brandcameo Product Placement Award Winner). The latest installment in the Transformers movie franchise premiered in Shanghai and was one of a limited number of 2012 US films to be screen in China, where it became a huge hit. China was Transformers 3′s most profitable market after the US, and its opening weekend set the all-time China record of a $46.8 million box office.

China also had an important role in the product placement of Transformers 3. Many of China’s homegrown brands scored major roles in this film: Lenovo, Meters/Bonwe, TCL and Yili Milk.

Introducing Chinese brands in US blockbusters has been tested a few years before with Transformers 2. This partnership enhanced both brand building and profitability and has opened the door to Chinese brands in Hollywood films. It benefits to Chinese brands but also to other brands, which can also gain popularity on the Chinese market (e.g. Chevrolet Camaro).

While the U.S./China trade deal creates an opening for 20 more US films, it also represents a secondary opportunity for 20 more multiples of product placement for brands looking to piggyback on blockbusters to reach a huge, hungry consumer group.

Posted in What's new? | Leave a comment

American Horror Story = Brands Horror Story?

American Horror Story is a new horror drama serie produced by Ryan Murphy  and Brad Falchuk (both: Nip Tuck, Glee). The series premiered on October 5, 2011, and is broadcast on the american cable television channel FX. They even announced a second season.

Plot: A family of three move from Boston to Los Angeles as a means of reconciling their past anguish. They move to a restored mansion, unaware that the home is haunted. American Horror Story has received generally positive reviews from critics. Chuck Barney of the San Jose Mercury News said “Most TV shows, after all, quickly fade from memory. This one will haunt your dreams.”

I’ve seen the eight first episodes and wonder why no one has written an article on the massive placement of brands. For the moment I think this serie is really well made. It is scary, confusing and kind of insane, even if it is mainly inspired by other horror movies.  Its pilot is a horror mixtape comprised of many familiar elements from other movies and TV shows. It borrows heavily from many horror subgenres (slasher, supernatural, monster, psychological). However it avoids excessive gore and manages to shock due to the dramatic atmosphere.

I’m only disappointed with one thing: the prominent product placement. I guess this serie was kind of costly but does it require that amount of placements? Most of them are central and prominent. Unless you are blind or lucky enough not to look at the screen everytime they introduce a brand, you really cannot miss them.

The question is: do they know that obvious placements are not really accepted by the audience? It seems that sometimes they forget placements are better accepted when they are integrated in the plot and fit with it. When one of the patient steals a mobile phone in the house, the strong focus on the Blackberry phone seems irrelevant. Even if it is related to the story (I won’t say more…) the focus is too long and too central. It looks more like an advertisement for the brand than an integration to the heart of the story.

Trailer:

Posted in Examples of product placement, What's new? | Leave a comment

Product placement: sizeable financing

Product placement could be a source of sizeable financing. The best example is Die Another day (Die Another Day, dir. Lee Tamahori, 2002) which received between 120 and 160 millions dollars from the associated brands in royalties and publicity support during the movie launch.

The cost of a movie is more and more expensive (competitors, investments, actors, team, postproduction, etc.), thus, product placement contracts can contribute at the financing of projects.

Contracts are not always paid. In partnership contracts, companies provide products required for a movie in exchange of the placement. This process reduces the cost of production. Sometimes the exchange is added by a promotion support during the launch of the movie. Sometimes, directors only ask for an authorization to introduce a product in their movies in order to make it credible, as a Chanel shop in Anastasia to illustrate a scene inParis. (Anastasia, dir. Don Bluth & Gary Goldman, 1997)

Product placement is an effective communication method, as during a projection the audience drops its “anti-advertisement attitude”. It is accepted by the audience when the presence of products and brands is tolerable and well-justified. Product placement helps to target a part of the audience. If the target is refined, the audience will be more involved and its attention will be more important. The objective of a brand is different and determined upon the type of movie.

Brands appreciate to be placed in movie based in the past, it states their long existence. They also appreciate to be placed in movie based in the future. It reinforces their current position and shows that the brand notoriety remains in the future. Moreover it helps the audience to understand that the movie is an anticipation movie based in the future.  Introducing a product or brand already existing in the current time helps the credibility of a movie.

It is not possible to give a real estimation of the prices, but if we consider the visual placement with a cost of x$, then the oral placement has a cost of 2x$, and the hands on placement has a cost of 3x$.

A list of main factors determining the cost of a placement could be: popularity of the brand, identification of the brand (perception on screen), budget of the movie, type of movie, credits (producer, actors, director), product exchange, importance of the placement (space on screen), localisation of the placement, integration in the plot, contact with the main actors, exclusiveness for the brand, recurrent placements, type of distribution, communication campaign and contract of placement. 

The majority of the big production companies has a marketing budget equivalent or superior to the production budget. The promotion tie-ins are contracts allowing brands to make a reference to movies in which they appear or not. It could be a special menu in McDonald’s or Burger King with toys dragged out from a movie.  By those promotional actions, the brands participate or take charge of the marketing budget. The tie-ins help to increase the impact of  both the movie and the brand communication.

Posted in Product Placement strategies | Leave a comment

Ikea’s web serie starring Illeana Douglas

Nowadays, most of the big companies produce their own web series. It is definitely a good way to promote its own brand, on a short length audio-visual aid.

Let’s face it, web series are the new trend. You can watch hundred of web series, produced by famous actors, famous directors, big companies, cinema and theatre students, etc….

For companies, the aim is to increase web traffic. On the contrary of product placements in movies, where companies cannot totally control their placements, web series allow a perfect control of advertising.

The plot: Illeana Douglas, famous actress, decides to retire from her Hollywood career and tries to  start a normal life while working at IKEA Burbank. It seems that her past is more difficult to leave behind than she thinks. She will be followed by her celebrity friends, stalkers and gossip columnists.

This web serie is a total success, they will launch a third season taking place in Sweden. This serie is seen as funny, full of irony and really entertaining. To be honest, even if the idea is not that bad, the music really annoys me. I have the feeling to be stuck in a lift for 8 min of serie.

The success of this web serie shows that the entertainment business is largely celebrity-oriented.  Is that the future for product placement on internet?

Trailer of the second season:

Trailer of the third season:

You can see all the episodes on the website: http://easytoassemble.tv .

Posted in Examples of product placement, Web Serie, What's new? | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

DumbDumb, Arnett and Bateman acting for Brands

Will Arnett and Jason Bateman, the two stars of Arrested Development, are joining forces to create a new digital-driven entertainment company. 

The company focus on commercials, shorts, and original content that could be adapted for the big screen.  Electus is set to deliver DumbDumb’s content via its already established comedy division while utilizing the web production and development infrastructure of CollegeHumor.com. Arnett and Bateman bring product placements to the next level.

Before they conceived DumbDumb, the two were already creating content. Bateman explains, “Will and I, and our friends and colleagues, are spending a lot of time doing these funny viral videos, sketches made for a low price,” he said. “It’s a fun hobby for a lot of us. There’s a marriage to be made there, between sponsors and what we find ourselves doing.”

Even if this type of industry is really competitive, DumbDumb can lead to a great success. They’ve got everything: great ideas, acting experience, good sense of humour, contacts and fame.

“We’ve got some ideas in mind, some things that might work great for soft drink or cookie or computer companies,” Bateman said. “We’ve been thinking about our advertising voice and brand, and at some point people will be immediately able to look and say, ‘That’s a DumbDumb spot.’”

If I have to give you my opinion, I think this is genius. Both actors already made me laugh my f*** ass off in Arrested Development and their project is really smart. It is well made, entertaining, absolutely funny and really creative. I hope to see many more from them soon.

A five-minute webisode for Wrigley’s Orbit chewing gum, “Prom Date” :

“The Dancer” :

You can find more on their website: http://dumbdumb.com/

Posted in Examples of product placement, Web Serie, What's new? | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Footloose: new version, old product placements

Footloose is back and the new remake stays faithful to the original script—and even in terms of product placement.

The new Footloose (2011) of Craig Brewer , starring Kenny Wormald and Julianne Hough, is the remake of the famous and well-loved Footloose (1984) of Herbert Ross, starring Kevin Bacon and Lori Singer.

The film features a Volkswagen Beetle, the exact model that was used in the 1984 original. The iconic car can also be seen in Footloose posters and its trailer.

For other brands, however, product integrations were removed. One of these brands is nike, an apparel maker that was worn by Kevin Bacon in the original film.

The producers also added new tie-ins, including the Home Shopping Network. The characters’ clothing line is featured in Fashion Nerrd Magazine, giving attention to different brands. The glossy 32-page magazine explores the film’s fashions from head to toe, including Levi’s, HSN and Deborah Lippman makeup.

Other product partners include: Salon Perfect, Boot Barn, and Greyhound.

Trailer of the new version: (obviously with the same car)

And the old version: (Beetle & Nike placement)

Posted in Examples of product placement, What's new? | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment